Demonstration boundaryNo real court dataNo legal effectNo automated judgment
Administrative capability record
The work of a court, without taking the place of a judge.
One configurable engine supports the administrative journey around human judicial authority. An institution can begin with one bounded problem beside its current system.
Recommended first discovery · 30 days
Registry readiness & deadline control
Map one authentic workflow, rehearse it with invented cases and measure administrative delay, rework and missed-notice risk—without replacing the official record.
Synthetic data only
No real case or personal data
No legal effect or production integration
No price or procurement promise on first contact
Discovery record
A defined beginning, evidence trail and exit.
The institution controls workflow scope, stop authority, deletion instruction and any permission to be named publicly.
Days 1–7Authority & scope
Confirm the competent owner, incumbent boundary, one workflow and exclusions.
Days 8–14Invented scenarios
Configure a draft pack and rehearse golden, defect, exception and continuity paths.
Days 15–23Administrative evidence
Measure readiness time, listing time, notice time, workload and rework—never judicial outcomes.
Days 24–30Findings & exit
Record gaps, follow the synthetic deletion instruction and make no production presumption.
Finds next free hearing slots, proposes dates after postponement, shows overloaded or vacant benches, and always requires a human confirmation before any reservation.
Best fit
Court network needing administrative calendar control
Current proof
Synthetic Auto Mode engine with readiness gates and network load view
Still required
Official roster feeds and human listing authority
03
Public transparency
Case information portal
Exact-reference status with minimum disclosed fields, enumeration resistance and clear no-legal-effect boundaries.
Best fit
Institution-approved public information channel
Current proof
Live allowlisted synthetic demonstration
Still required
Official publication policy and authoritative source
04
Bounded full journey
Tribunal operations workspace
Filing, service, mediation, hearing readiness, human-signed decisions, compliance, closure and reporting in one configurable pack.
Best fit
Specialised tribunal or quasi-judicial body
Current proof
Invented multilingual tribunal pack
Still required
Competent authority, official workflow and assurance
05
Administrative foundation
Registry & audit core
Case register, object-level access, encrypted documents, manual fallback, reconciliation and tamper-evident history.
Best fit
New or modernising administrative service
Current proof
Persistent synthetic engine and recovery drills
Still required
Institution identity, keys, records policy and hosting
Interoperability
Works beside what exists
Versioned REST contracts and strict synthetic CSV interchange are implemented. Akoma Ntoso is treated correctly as a legal-document format—not a universal case-management schema.
Evidence
Measure administration, never justice
The contract measures administrative milestones, rework and workload. It rejects judgment, bail, sentence, credibility and outcome-quality metrics.
Languages
Locale-ready, translation-controlled
Packs declare multilingual examples. Locale storage exists; production translations still require qualified human review and accessibility testing.
Before any engagement
Research is not buyer qualification.
A public website, grant programme or contact address does not establish demand or permission to sell.
Competent authority and current commercial route verified
Operational gap confirmed by current primary evidence
Existing system and integration boundary understood
Claims, sender identity and domain authentication reviewed
Human authorisation required before any message
Current outreach status: do not send until every applicable gate is evidenced.
Current engineering record
Built to demonstrate safely.
15 invented public scenarios
Three configurable synthetic jurisdictions
Real data blocked by eight institutional gates
No automated judicial outcome
This is engineering evidence, not court acceptance, productivity proof or procurement readiness.